Possible test – criteria – this is how labeling devices are tested in a comparison:

Construction and size

According to these test criteria, we compare labeling devices or beschriftungsgerät. The labeling devices in the test and comparison vary in design and size. Certain brands offer narrow and wide models, others handy and compact, which are narrow and more ergonomic.

The test shows that both forms are practical and suitable for everyday use. Included in the test and comparison are mechanical labeling devices that have a rotary wheel and an alphabet scale, which then allow printing per letter.


The selection of formatting options in the test and comparison particularly concerns the font sizes and fonts. The setting of italic, bold, or underlined fonts is also rated positively. The input can be made directly via the keyboard or the display.

Depending on the model, extended punctuation is possible for the labeling devices in the test and comparison. Advantageous are models where formatting can be set before printing or where templates can be used.

Labeling effects

The following characteristics are important in a labeling device test comparison of the devices that can be made in a test and comparison regarding the use of labeling effects and cliparts. If the scope is large, the models can be used more creatively. For normal applications, however, devices with a selection of several fonts and font sizes are sufficient in the test and comparison.

Very good are labeling devices, which permit umlauts and can print special characters. Effects can be e.g. frames and squiggly typefaces.

Printing and quality

The clean and clear expression and also good visibility of font effects or cliparts are crucial for testing and comparison. If the tape is embossed, the color should not blur or fade, but should also be easy to read over time. The length output of the ribbon was also an evaluation criterion. Preference was given to models that save material and do not have too much waste.

Layout and keyboard layout

The tests compare how large and useful the keyboard is, which labeling options and operation are more suitable and how fast the input can be made. The test results in many devices an advantage with the classical QWERTY keyboard, which is nevertheless a matter of habit. The input is faster possible.

What do I have to consider when buying a labeling device?

What do I have to pay attention to when buying a labeling device test winner? The purchase of a labeling device can be completely tailored to the use. If you use labeling devices mainly for sorting and organizing, you do not need extensive functions. You can also choose between very handy and compact or slightly larger devices.

Equipment and functions

The functional range of the labeling devices differs. Digital electrical devices have a display that allows accurate and controlled input and also the preview of the desired label. In addition, it is possible to store data and use templates. For the purchase, a good selection of different formatting options and fonts is recommended, as well as the use of appropriate software.

Type of keyboard for easy input

With a labeling device of the test, winner purchase must pay attention to these Tipps? the keyboard layout can be a simple ABC variant or a QWERTZ layout. The ABC keyboard is alphabetically structured and can be operated very quickly and clearly. It follows the modern system in test and comparison and does not require a lot of searching for letters or prior knowledge of their arrangement.

The QWERTY keyboard shows the classic layout pattern, which corresponds to the German standard and starts with the letters Q, W, E, R, T, and Z. This allows writing with the ten-finger system, while the ABC keyboard allows input with one finger.

This allows the QWERTY keyboard to be operated a little faster, but this is less important in the small version. Mechanical inscription devices are operated in the comparison again over a rotary wheel, which makes an adjustment of the respective letter possible.

Holly is focusing on Google and Yahoo. He previously worked for PandoDaily and Fortune Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *